もんじゅ西村裁判Monjyu Tribuanl

アクセスカウンタ

zoom RSS Statement

<<   作成日時 : 2017/01/28 22:58   >>

ブログ気持玉 0 / トラックバック 0 / コメント 0

                                                         December 26, 2016

                             Statemen
To the Tokyo District Court
                      Plaintiff   ToshikoNishimura
             Record
In this case, the defendant issued a newspaper article with evidence and
the evidence of the investigative agency is two newspaper articles and it is surprisingly poor.
We will disclose the investigation system and investigation record (initial investigation, inspection, investigation, physical evidence and relics) of the central station against the historical "Monjyu accident" and its associated "Nishimura death case", and this case will clarify the case There is a need.
 The contents of the announcement to the press by the Chuho police office on January 13, 1996 (the date of death, the place, the cause of death, the cause of death, the type of injury, its Means). Furthermore, it spread quickly and effectively through media (TV, radio, newspaper, weekly magazine). The police information effectively restricted the media, and has been on end for a long time.
 However, the Chuoh police office refuses to explain the actual situation of the case to the bereaved families, does not restore or disclose the records of investigation, relics (all clothes etc.).They did not return and disclose.
The Chuoh police office erred the initial investigation and did not strictly observe the criminal investigation norm and the examination regulation, so I accredited this case as a suicide case.
The "examination rule" is decided as follows.
In Article 1, this rule establishes procedures, methods and other necessary matters concerning postmortem observation at the time of discovering a dead or suspected death or death (hereinafter referred to as "dead body") or receiving notification that there is this It is aimed at. Hereinafter,
(Report) Article 2, Article 3 (Notice to prosecutors) Article 4, (preservation on site) Article 4, (proxy for staring) Article 5, (prospect of inspection) Article 6. 8 It is true if there is a will.
First, I studied the estimated time of death of Nishimura Norio.
Takano witnesses, Ochiai testimony testified that "We did not measure the depth of body temperature of Nishimura Shigenori", and found that there is no scientific basis for the estimated time of death announced by the central office.
1. Contradiction between forensic death estimated time and date of asylum time
@ Last witness of survival of Shigeo. Nishimura
The time when the survival of S .Nishimura was confirmed at the end was witnessed by reporters and others at the time of the completion at the press briefing venue of the U.S. 4 issue's January 12, 1996 22: 05 Science and Technology Agency
A The year, month, day, hour, hour and minute are written in the "document" written by the central department. The number is the handwritten by others by the handwriting expert opinion, the year, month, day, hour and minute to delay the estimated death time Categorized, and even cryptically, the central station has not returned to the surviving family the writing instrument (fountain pen) used to create the "document".
B Expert opinion of legal medical doctor
The estimated time of death of the expert opinion is assumed to be around 2 o'clock on January 13, 1996.
CCalculate death estimation time by "forensic medicine" (document a.b. c.)
Document a: "Forensic Studies" Decrease in body temperature per hour of the body ( evidenceNo10)
Document b: St. Luke International Hospital Medical Record, Deep Body Temperature 27 [℃] ( evidenceNo6)
Document c: Meteorological weather station (Observation point: Tokyo District Meteorological Observatory) ( evidenceNo4 – 2)
1996 1/12 - January 13 Outdoor temperature in the city center
Estimated death time from data C a.b. c
Estimated death time is 22:05 ~ 22 January, January 12, 1996 at the end of a press conference at the Japan Agency for Anti-
It will be around 1 o'clock on January 13 (in the case of death with the outside air in the city center).
(Unlike the announcement by the Chuoh police station, before you check in to The Center Hotel Tokyo, you have already died somewhere.
D The Chuoh police station did not measure deep body temperature (testimony)
• Ochiai testimony and Takano testimony did not measure deep body temperature and testified that there is no memory.
The Chuoh police station did not measure deep body temperature and had recognized a death time without any scientific basis.
2. About The Chuoh police office announcement "cause of death • suicide jumping off hotel"
(Note: order of hotel entrance, room, fax, wills, relics, jumping suicide, inspecting, relics, survivors and order of explanation)
When checking and organizing Takano and Ochiai testimony for the main interrogation, the abnormality of the investigation emerges. In the case of
@ About books checked in to The Center Hotel Tokyo
• Ochiai testimonies are not remembered for confiscation
A About the picture of the center hotel room
• Ochiai testimonies entered the hotel room, but there is no memory that photographed.
• Takano witnesses entered the room in the procedure of prosecution.
Room 803 was not involved in the incident and he did not make a lucky decision.
B About 5 sheets of FAX receiving paper ( evidenceNo. 2)
(Note: 5 fax receipts announced by the Chuoh police staition that FAX sent a mobile flame, received by The Center Hotel Tokyo, was in room 803)
• Ochiai testimony and Takano have no memory of 5 fax reception papers
CAbout the fountain pen used for describing the will of ( evidenceNo. 8)
• Ochiai testimonies have a will on the desk and brought them to the police station, they have not shot the fountain pen.
D Collection of articles (coats, mufflers, bags, etc.) Delivery procedure
• Takano Witnesses will process receipts and leave receipts when transferring relics to stakeholders
• There is a possibility that Takano witness temporarily held the deposit with the police.
E About relic index
• Takano witness shall be described by watching memorandum and memorandum in the article catalog. Post the deposit in the handling book to the book, you receive the signature seal on the delivery form, there is no memory of the procedure of the delivery form in this case
G About photographing of investigation materials, body dead bodies and dead bodies
• Ochiai testimony produced a photography report. Emergency staircase landing, hotel full view
I shot. the dead body was put on a stretcher . The back of his trousers was torn.
Q (interrogation): Have you photographed the body photograph of the body found? A (Ochiai): silence.
There was no trace of fighting. Falling point, I took some emergency stairs. There is no incidents. Judgment was made by listening to the wills, hotel officials, story of the same dormitory.
• Takano witness does not judge the situation of suicide incident. Since this incident has become a social problem, we have confirmed the live condition and affixed the photograph to the live report. There is no memory of a blood stain, a scratch that fell to the ground, a scar of the head and back, a trace of the object, a stretcher, a stretcher, the dead body is stumbling, a shoe, a bag, a fall trace are not done. The lane tracking distinguished the emergency staircase, the jumping place, the falling point, but it can not be said that there was grounds. There is a possibility that the police temporarily keep things other than his will.

H About censure hearing (at the center hotel)
• Takano witnesses were tried by three people and heard.
I Documents at the time of the inspection, on the condition of the dead body and photo shooting.
• Ochiai testimonied, I did not measure deep body temperature.
I took pictures of the dead body. The appearance of the whole clothes, I did not shoot the damage.
• Mr. Takano wrote a prospectus, prepare documents at the time of posture. I do not measure deep body temperature. I have not written abrasions of my arms and legs in the lives,
J From the hospital to the central office about the transfer of clothing and personal belongings
• Takano witness does not remember receipt.
L Regarding records of clothing, personal belongings and articles left over with a stare
• Takano witness is written in the memorandum and posted to the investigation documents,
Q (interrogation): Did you investigate clothes, portable items, and items left for the case in the inspection procedure?
A (Takano): If you normally do, post the memorandum to the handling register.
Q (interrogation): We can be heard that the handling record remains as records in the case of disposition?
A (Takano): I think so. Write in the order of keeping in the handling records, posting the memorandum to the handling record
MAbout delivery of clothes, personal belongings and articles left over
• Ochiai testimonies will not be silently discarded. Because I approved as suicide, I handed it in by the police
There is no need to do. If you hand it to stakeholders, bereaved families, company officials, receipts remain in the police.
Q (interrogation): Do you write catalogs of relics in books if you keep them with the police?
A (Ochiai): Write it in the book of memorandum. Confirm the surrender and obtain signature stamp on delivery form. I do not remember whether I took the above procedures in this case.
• Takano testimony to bereaved family
M About the state of clothing
• Ochiai testimonies contained clothes in a plastic bag all together.
☆ However, I have not seen any bereaved family.
• Takano Watanabe does not remember confirming the damage of clothing at the time of post-surveillance
N About surviving family and correspondence (in hospital)
• Takano Witness does not correspond to the bereaved family
O About whether the matter was heard from Hirose
• I think Takano witnessed because he was in the same room of the criminal division
P About the survivor response (within the Chuoh police office)
• Takano witness is done by the criminal section manager or deputy criminal manager.

3. Did you ask that the bereaved family came to the station and asked about the case in search of the case?
• I do not know Takano testimony. After the lawsuit began, the defendant's agent asked.
4.About Hirose Testimony
@ When Hirose corresponded to Nishimura
• Hirose Witness corresponds to Nishimura around January 1997.
Nishimura opinion (4. 1. Truth of Hirose testimony)
Nishimura does not meet Mr. Hirose at the Chuoh police staition around January 1997.
I first visited the Chuoh police staition and Mr Hirose responded to around April 1996 (1996). As representative of this case, Mr. Hirose responded, he brought the case file (10 cm width) from the criminal section to the visiting room and explained it while watching it.
Mr. Hirose said, "Your husband was a suicide by hijacking, Yasuo Arai, Seikiti Takano, Satoshi Ochiai were transferred to the Ebara police station already in charge of Mrs. Nishimura's case, There is currently no one who can explain to the Chuoh police station I have to go and ask the person in charge directly. " Takano Witness, Ochiai In the testimony I visited when I visited (April H8),S. Takano and S.Ochiai attended the central office and I could explain the case, but Mr. Hirose prevented the opportunity of meeting and explanation, We had taken measures to have the bereaved families give up trying to clarify the case. Takano testimony, the transferee by Ochiai testimonial, the time is as follows.
• In January 1998, Takano Witness transferred to Hikarigaoka police station
• Ochiai testimony transferred to Denenchofu police station in the summer of 1996
5. About relics
• Hirose testimony
@ Received a request for measures of a set of clothes and was disposed.
A There is no talk of fax reception paper from the bereaved family. I looked at the evidence repository for the remains. The remains belong to the notes of the investigators at the time,
B I remember that there was a sign on the handling document
C There are times when handed out belongings to colleagues. At that time, when grasping the whole, presented to NishimuraFinally confirmed.
D Place items with no property value in one plastic bag and take administrative procedures. Mr. Nishimura surely returned what the police kept, but I do not remember.
E "There is no original shape of clothing and feces has splashed ..." Mrs. Nishimura suddenly realized that he remembered
Nishimura opinion (5. About relics)
@ There was no talk of the police dispose of measures of a set of clothes.
A The plaintiff told about fax disclosure. Fax is important because it is evidence that life is alive at the hotel or has already died.
B Request the submission of the stamped seal handled by Mr. Hirose.
C It is an error in the initial investigation to transfer the artifacts to colleagues (the first bodies of the body and the important references). Why could Mr. Hirose confirm the receipt certificate that the central office has not offered to me? Request the submission of the receipt certificate.
D All clothes are the most important evidence as the value of the investigation. Who in the central government saw what time, where, and what color plastic bag was in? I could not see all the clothing of my life. Ask for the return of all their clothes. Request the submission of the Administrative Procedure

5.In order to confirm the truth of the central station and Hirose testimony, the contents of the catalog and the takeover receipt
Ask for submission of catalogs and receipts deposited by the police. When Mr. Hirose met with me, there was no explanation for "clothing original shape and feces splashing ...". Why does Mr. Hirose testify selfish fables? Because I explained in the room of the criminal division, I asked for the submission of the recording tape. If there is no recording tape of the conversation, it is a false proof of Mr. Hirose, and it is amazed with only severe testimony.
6. Confirm evidence and testimony
By checking the defendant's evidence and testimony, this case began with the fact that the initial investigation of the investigative institution (investigation, commentary judgment, photography) was not strictly observed. The Chuoh police station neglected the initial investigation, and announced it to the press as police information and became a newspaper article.
1996.1 / 13 Yomiuri Shinbun Evening edition reported that "A man with a dark blue suits on the street below the emergency staircase at Center Hotel Tokyo has been found to have been lying down and stabbing from the head."
In the newspaper article "I found out collapsing and falling down", the Chuoh police station told one to Media as if I had taken the investigation, the live scout, the evidence photograph.
Submitting the photograph of "Dead man falling down from the head with a dark blue suits on the street under the emergency staircase at the Center hotel Tokyo," and returning all the clothes of the body
. In addition, seek a briefing of the bodies of dead bodies at the time of inspection and submit photographs taken.
The investigation institution has the significance of its existence by taking on the prevention of crime, investigation, disclosure, disclosure of evidence, etc. and the public affairs of accountability.
the end

テーマ

関連テーマ 一覧


月別リンク

ブログ気持玉

クリックして気持ちを伝えよう!
ログインしてクリックすれば、自分のブログへのリンクが付きます。
→ログインへ

トラックバック(0件)

タイトル (本文) ブログ名/日時

トラックバック用URL help


自分のブログにトラックバック記事作成(会員用) help

タイトル
本 文

コメント(0件)

内 容 ニックネーム/日時

コメントする help

ニックネーム
本 文
Statement もんじゅ西村裁判Monjyu Tribuanl/BIGLOBEウェブリブログ
文字サイズ:       閉じる